Real Commitment or Symbolic Legitimacy? Mattessich's Critique of the Deposit-on-Call Scheme

Authors

  • Yayuk Ari Priyani Doctoral Program in Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Sri Iswati Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61754/juralinus.v4i1.204

Keywords:

Real Commitment, Pseudo-Legitimacy, Deposit on Call

Abstract

This study is based on Mattessich’s philosophy of accounting, using legitimacy theory as the analytical framework to examine the policy of placing state funds in the Deposit-on-Call scheme. The study aims to critically assess whether the policy reflects a real commitment or merely symbolic legitimacy.

A qualitative approach with Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is employed. The data consist of official news reports and policy documents related to the Minister of Finance’s policy and its public discourse. The analysis is conducted through three stages: linguistic analysis of policy texts, discursive practice analysis to identify rhetorical strategies and legitimacy narratives, and social practice analysis to evaluate the extent to which the policy represents substantive commitment or symbolic legitimacy.

The findings indicate that the Deposit-on-Call policy demonstrates a dual character. On one hand, it reflects real commitment through objectives such as reducing bank funding costs, expanding credit capacity, and supporting productive sectors, particularly MSMEs. On the other hand, the policy also carries the risk of symbolic legitimacy if transparency and accountability in fund distribution are not effectively ensured. The legitimacy of the policy is therefore contingent upon the actual realization of credit distribution and the equitable impact on the real sector. If the funds only enhance banking liquidity without generating tangible benefits for the real economy, the policy risks becoming symbolic in nature, consistent with Mattessich’s critique of appearance without substantive societal impact.

References

Abhayawansa, S., Liu, Z., & Guthrie, J. (2021). Validity in content analysis-based intellectual capital disclosure research: a critical review. Research Handbook on Intellectual Capital and Business, 49–70.

Abiola-Adams, O., Azubuike, C., Sule, A. K., & Okon, R. (2021). Optimizing balance sheet performance: Advanced asset and liability management strategies for financial stability. International Journal of Scientific Research Updates, 2(1), 55–65.

Allen, F., Barlevy, G., & Gale, D. (2022). Asset price booms and macroeconomic policy: A risk-shifting approach. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 14(2), 243–280.

Allen, S., Čapkun, S., Eyal, I., Fanti, G., Ford, B. A., Grimmelmann, J., Juels, A., Kostiainen, K., Meiklejohn, S., & Miller, A. (2020). Design choices for central bank digital currency: Policy and technical considerations. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Arif, I., & Dutta, N. (2024). Legitimacy of government and governance. Journal of Institutional Economics, 20, e14.

Bauer, M. W. (2024). Public administration under populist rule: Standing up against democratic backsliding. International Journal of Public Administration, 47(15), 1019–1031.

Biber, D. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press google schola, 2, 230–239.

Brandsma, G. J., & Meijer, A. (2022). Transparency and the efficiency of multi-actor decision-making processes: an empirical analysis of 244 decisions in the European Union. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(3), 626–643.

Brown, J., & Dillard, J. (2021). Accounting for non-financial matters: technologies of humility as a means for developing critical dialogic accounting and accountability. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(2), 197–218.

Deegan, C. (2017). Twenty five years of social and environmental accounting research within Critical Perspectives of Accounting: Hits, misses and ways forward. Critical perspectives on accounting, 43, 65–87.

Deegan, C. M. (2019). Legitimacy theory: Despite its enduring popularity and contribution, time is right for a necessary makeover. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2307–2329.

Fahroji. (2025). Dampak Menkeu Purbaya Purbaya Gelontorkan Rp200 Triliun ke Himbara, dari Protes Hotman Paris hingga untuk Kredit di Desa. Erapos Online. www.era-pos.com/ekonomi/1036608994/dampak-menkeu-purbaya-purbaya-gelontorkan-rp200-triliun-ke-himbara-dari-protes-hotman-paris-hingga-untuk-kredit-di-desa?page=2&utm_source=chatgpt.com

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. Edward Arnold London.

Grossi, G., & Argento, D. (2022). The fate of accounting for public governance development. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(9), 272–303.

Kiwi, D., Khanagha, S., & Alexiou, A. (2025). Understanding the Role of Legitimacy During Strategic Change in Public Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda. Public Performance & Management Review, 1–39.

Kraft, B., & Wolf, S. (2018). Through the lens of accountability: Analyzing legitimacy in environmental governance. Organization & Environment, 31(1), 70–92.

Liu, I. T., & Dixon, A. D. (2021). Legitimating state capital: The global financial professions and the transnationalization of Chinese sovereign wealth. Development and Change, 52(5), 1251–1273.

Mattessich, R. (2003). Accounting research and researchers of the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century: an international survey of authors, ideas and publications. Accounting, Business & Financial History, 13(2), 125–170.

Rianti, E. (2025). Menkeu Purbaya Terbitkan Aturan, Rp200 Triliun di 5 Bank Wajib Dukung Sektor Riil. republika.co.id. https://ekonomi.republika.co.id/berita/t2ij4n416/copylink?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Şahiniz, S., Ustabaş, A., & Fındıklı, M. A. (2024). The effect of corporate discourses in brand awareness and legitimacy: The rhetorical analysis of an automobile brand. Asia Pacific Management Review, 29(4), 427–440.

Setiyo, A. (2025). Dampak Menkeu Purbaya Gelontorkan Rp200 Triliun ke Himbara, dari Protes Hotman Paris hingga untuk Kredit di Desa. liputan7.id. https://www.liputan7.id/ekonomi/2121631721/dampak-menkeu-purbaya-gelontorkan-rp200-triliun-ke-himbara-dari-protes-hotman-paris-hingga-untuk-kredit-di-desa?page=2&utm_source=chatgpt.com

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review, 20(3), 571–610.

Syachruddien, M. (2025). Menkeu Purbaya Bongkar Alasan Guyur Rp200 Triliun ke Himbara, Protes Hotman Paris Jadi Bukti Strategi Berjalan. bangbara.com. https://www.bangbara.com/peristiwa/36915961539/menkeu-purbaya-bongkar-alasan-guyur-rp200-triliun-ke-himbara-protes-hotman-paris-jadi-bukti-strategi-berjalan?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Taylor, E. Z., & Williams, P. F. (2020). The Routledge handbook of accounting ethics. Routledge.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. The handbook of discourse analysis, 466–485.

Verhaegen, S., Scholte, J. A., & Tallberg, J. (2021). Explaining elite perceptions of legitimacy in global governance. European Journal of International Relations, 27(2), 622–650.

Zimmermann, R., Duval, J. F. L., Werner, C., & Sterling, J. D. (2022). Quantitative insights into electrostatics and structure of polymer brushes from microslit electrokinetic experiments and advanced modelling of interfacial electrohydrodynamics. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 59, 101590.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Ari Priyani, Y., & Iswati, S. (2026). Real Commitment or Symbolic Legitimacy? Mattessich’s Critique of the Deposit-on-Call Scheme. Jurnal Akuntansi Publik Nusantara, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.61754/juralinus.v4i1.204

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Akuntansi Publik Nusantara (JURALINUS), January-June 2026

Section

Articles